Junk Food Lit Doesn’t Lead to Healthy Reading Choices

As many know, I have no problem stepping on the sacred toes of others. I get mine stomped on a few times as well, and I actually enjoy the game. As I teach my students, if a person cannot justify or explain why he/she does something, then perhaps he/she shouldn’t be doing whatever it is.

So, I’m about to stomp on someone’s sacred toes, and if you feel I’m about to stomp on yours, pull on your steel-toed boots.

I disagree with the following illogical argument:

Well, the Twilight Saga may not be the best written series, it may even have its flaws, but at least it’s getting kids to read.

Hmmm–really?

Let’s restate this bit of daft logic another way:

Well, Hustler magazine may be pornographic and degrading to women, but it’s getting young males interested in photography and female anatomy.

These two  statements are prime examples of the “I Give Up Trying and Will Just Let the Kids and Popular Media Decide for Themselves because It’s Really too Hard to Be a Parent and an Adult because the Kids May Think I’m not Cool” New Age / Modernistic Philosophy.

Giving in to the false conclusion that popular bad literature is fine as long as it gets kids to read is like saying that Twinkies and Happy Meals are acceptable children’s diet because they get kids to eat.

Twinkies and Happy Meals are not gateway foods to Healthy Cuisine any more than the Twilight Saga is a gateway series to Of Human Bondage or Beowulf or The Art of War.

A kid whose diet consists of junk food like Twinkies and Happy Meals will seek out other junk foods.

In the same vein (and, yes, the pun is intended), kids whose reading fare consists of  prose doggerel like the Twilight Saga will seek out other junk writing.

Twilight is little more than a 1960s romance comic + Dark Shadows vampire soap opera.

I first broached this idea on my Facebook page, and I got a response that perhaps the Twilight Saga was encouraging kids to write.

Well, yes, that’s true, too.

Absolutely nothing wrong with imitation–highest form of flattery–even Shakespeare took ideas and motifs from other writers–even very, very bad writers.

I, too, imitated my favorite writers when I was a child and young teen and began writing stories that imitated their tales–Poe, Hawthorne, Crane, Shakespeare, Maugham, Cooper, et cetera.

And I got the bulk of my ideas from Classics Illustrated comic books–yes, I read the comics’ version of the great writers when I was quite young. This series led me directly to reading the complete classic works themselves when I was older.

When a student talks to me about what he/she is reading and it’s junk-food lit like the Twilight Saga, I don’t chide or discourage him/her from his/her choice.

Rather, I try my best over a period of time and through discussion of literature to guide him/her in a better direction by suggesting writers such as Cynthia Leitich Smith, Laurie Halse Anderson, Neil Gaimon, Robert Newton Peck, et al.

And I’ve been successful in a few cases. Kids have actually come up to me and said, “You know, Mr. S, I don’t know why everybody likes Twilight. I just read Eternal, and it’s great!”

God bless Stephanie for her success.

However, don’t equate pop culture fandom with the bridge to bigger and better works of literature.

Let’s accept the Twilight Saga and other pop culture junk-food lit for what it is and guide kids to the better writers and stories out there.

After all, a Twinkie or a Happy Meal every now and then won’t kill anyone, but a steady diet is not good.

And a steady diet of doggerel prose will create a generation of intellectually diabetic, right-brained obese, and spiritually malnourished readers who don’t know any better.

See you on the bookshelves.

LMG Swain

PS: Do you remember when Stephen King called his books the Big Mac and fries of literature? At the time, he thought he was just making a cool statement about his popularity, but he has regretted making the statement as it actually equated his good work to junk food.

 

4 Comments

    1. I love Plan Nine from Outer Space, Pineapple Express, From Dusk to Dawn, and a ton of over junk food movies–but only because I first appreciated Citizen Kane, Seven Samurai, Blue Velvet, and Blood Simple. I would never suggest that Pineapple Express or Plan Nine are appetizers for the great cinema we have. In hindsight, I think I should have chosen another series that is just as heavy in fat and literary calories but not as popular. But, then again, stepping on toes, both literally, figuratively, and realistically, is something I’ve done since that first junior high slow dance with Bobbie Brooks. And I’ll admit to liking the Twilight Saga enough to keep me reading them, but they are not Eternal or Interview with a Vampire.

      I’m so thrill to have met you at SCBWI, and I look forward to the continuing conversation!

      Be well,
      Larry Mike

      Like

  1. There’s room for both healthy and junk in a diet. “Dusk to Dawn” is not exactly literary dissertation on the human condition either and certainly not on the level of “Sense and Sensibility” but was very funny. Variety is key. I’m not convinced a steady diet of veggies or meat is a healthy thing. Balance counts.
    Besides, Jacob was cute in the book and the movie.

    Like

    1. I can’t agree more with you. I love a good Twinkie, but if given a choice of one last bite between a Twinkie or a medium well-done steak, I take that last bite of steak every time. The same reading choices goes for myself and when students ask for my suggestions. “Read ‘Eternal’ first”, I say, “and then ‘Interview with a Vampire’ and then read ‘Twilight’. You’ll understand then the difference as to what is steak literature and what is Twinkie literature.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s